7.24.2008
Let me get this straight...
I recently discovered Hulu, a joint venture by NBC Universal and News Corp to provide video content online. Hulu is an effort by two of the big media outlets to compete with Apple and itunes. So far I have been impressed by what they have available.
High-def versions of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report? Where have you been all my life?
But then I noticed something kind of interesting. On Wednesday's Colbert Report, Stephen has Naz on as his guest. Naz has been in a bit of a dispute with Bill O'Reilly and Fox News. So here I am watching Naz in beautiful hi-def video, streaming on my computer FOR FREE as he takes Bill O'Reilly, Rupert Murdoch, Fox News, and News Corp. to task. It seems unlikely that the content providers are aware of, no less condone, the content they are providing me, but that didn't diminish my enjoyment of the show any.
High-def versions of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report? Where have you been all my life?
But then I noticed something kind of interesting. On Wednesday's Colbert Report, Stephen has Naz on as his guest. Naz has been in a bit of a dispute with Bill O'Reilly and Fox News. So here I am watching Naz in beautiful hi-def video, streaming on my computer FOR FREE as he takes Bill O'Reilly, Rupert Murdoch, Fox News, and News Corp. to task. It seems unlikely that the content providers are aware of, no less condone, the content they are providing me, but that didn't diminish my enjoyment of the show any.
7.20.2008
7.15.2008
Googlehead
Radiohead created a video for House of Cards using "two scanning technologies to capture 3D images. Geometric Informatics scanning systems produced structured light to capture 3D images at close proximity, while a Velodyne LIDAR system that uses multiple lasers was used to capture large environments such as landscapes. In the video, 64 lasers rotating and shooting in a 360 degree radius 900 times per minute produced all the exterior scenes."
Google partnered with the band to provide more info about the technology.
Check it out.
Google partnered with the band to provide more info about the technology.
Check it out.
Labels:
geometric informatics,
google,
house of cards,
radiohead,
velodyne LIDAR
7.04.2008
G8 science ministers to expand low carbon R&D
According to Cordis News, the G8 plus several G20 countries have agreed to increase government support for low carbon research and development:
scidev.net has a ton of content on this and other related issues.
Science ministers from the G8 countries have agreed to increase funding for research and development to create a low–carbon economy.
The ministers, along with representatives from Brazil, China, India, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, the Philippines and South Africa, met at the first G8 Science and Technology Ministers' meeting in Okinawa, Japan, this week (15 June).
Participants agreed to cooperate on research into energy technologies, including carbon capture and storage and the development of biofuels from non-food plant material.
They also expressed a commitment to the commercialisation of such technology through government funding and measures to encourage investment by the private sector.
Recognising the role of science and technology capacity building in developing countries, the group suggested that developing-country scientists should be able to work more closely with institutions in G8 countries — provided mechanisms were in place to encourage them to return home and thus avoid brain drain.
'Brain circulation', where G8 countries receive and send researchers to developing countries was also discussed.
There are plans for a workshop to discuss science and technology cooperation between G8 and developing countries in October.
5.18.2008
Newly Mint
So I don't really intend for this blog to end up just being a list of various websites and services I've tried and like, but recently I've come across a few new things I feel like passing along.
The latest is a personal finance site called Mint. Mint is fantastic because it monitors my finances for me and gives me various analytical tools and displays to show me what I'm doing with my money. Switching from Quicken to Mint is akin to switching from traditional folder based email to searchable Gmail. Mint automatically figures out what categories my expenses fall under and uses graphs to illustrate spending patterns.
The exciting thing about Mint is that it's growing and changing quickly. New features and options are always being added. The other nice thing is that the user interface is incredibly intuitive. It gets you up and running quickly and easily.
Check it out.
The latest is a personal finance site called Mint. Mint is fantastic because it monitors my finances for me and gives me various analytical tools and displays to show me what I'm doing with my money. Switching from Quicken to Mint is akin to switching from traditional folder based email to searchable Gmail. Mint automatically figures out what categories my expenses fall under and uses graphs to illustrate spending patterns.
The exciting thing about Mint is that it's growing and changing quickly. New features and options are always being added. The other nice thing is that the user interface is incredibly intuitive. It gets you up and running quickly and easily.
Check it out.
4.12.2008
TED Talks

"TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design. It started out (in 1984) as a conference bringing together people from those three worlds. Since then its scope has become ever broader."
Their website has lots of great videos of recent, and not so recent, speakers.
Al Gore's new slideshow on climate change was especially compelling.
4.06.2008
Brijit
I've tried on several occasions to use an RSS aggregator to put all of the stuff I want to read in one place. I also seem to end up with thousands of unread articles. I hate feeling stressed for not reading all of this stuff. At the same time, I'm still looking for something to help me get all of the things I want to keep an eye on in one place.
I just started trying out Brijit. Brijit combines the RSS feed concept with human editors who summarize articles down to 100 blurbs. You can easily find the full article if the summary interests you. Brijit also compares your preferences with other uses and recommends other articles, etc. Sounds good in theory--we'll see how it goes. (You can see my recently read articles, etc, on the sidebar to the right)
I just started trying out Brijit. Brijit combines the RSS feed concept with human editors who summarize articles down to 100 blurbs. You can easily find the full article if the summary interests you. Brijit also compares your preferences with other uses and recommends other articles, etc. Sounds good in theory--we'll see how it goes. (You can see my recently read articles, etc, on the sidebar to the right)
1.19.2008
Social Finance
I'm intrigued by sites that combine social networking trends with opportunities for commerce. Zopa allows potential loan recipients to bypass the traditional loan providers and borrow directly from other lenders. Pretty cool.
1.10.2008
Think about it
I just heard about a new website designed to be a sort of YouTube for ideas. Pretty interesting stuff...
"bigthink.com is a new and growing website, currently in its private beta version, with a simple mission:
This is a digital age, one in which a wealth of accessible information empowers you, the citizen-consumer. But where is the information coming from? How accurate and unprocessed is it, really? Ask yourself this: how empowered do you feel debating a television screen or a newspaper?
Our task is to move the discussion away from talking heads and talking points, and give it back to you. That is Big Think's mission. In practice, this means that our information is truly interactive. When you log onto our site, you can access hundreds of hours of direct, unfiltered interviews with todays leading thinkers, movers and shakers. You can search them by question or by topic, and, best of all, respond in kind. Upload a video in which you take on Senator Ted Kennedy's views on immigration; post a slideshow of your trip to China that supports David Dollar's assertion that pollution in China is a major threat; or answer with plain old fashioned text. You can respond to the interviewee, respond to a responder or heck, throw your own question or idea into the ring."
"bigthink.com is a new and growing website, currently in its private beta version, with a simple mission:
This is a digital age, one in which a wealth of accessible information empowers you, the citizen-consumer. But where is the information coming from? How accurate and unprocessed is it, really? Ask yourself this: how empowered do you feel debating a television screen or a newspaper?
Our task is to move the discussion away from talking heads and talking points, and give it back to you. That is Big Think's mission. In practice, this means that our information is truly interactive. When you log onto our site, you can access hundreds of hours of direct, unfiltered interviews with todays leading thinkers, movers and shakers. You can search them by question or by topic, and, best of all, respond in kind. Upload a video in which you take on Senator Ted Kennedy's views on immigration; post a slideshow of your trip to China that supports David Dollar's assertion that pollution in China is a major threat; or answer with plain old fashioned text. You can respond to the interviewee, respond to a responder or heck, throw your own question or idea into the ring."
11.17.2007
Adapt to Win

Arianna Huffington recently wrote on the Huffington Post about a project by Rich Silverstein (the award winning ad exec who came up with the "Got Milk?" and Budweiser frog campaigns, among others).

Huffington says Silverstein "had such a grasp of what makes for effective communication in radio, movies, TV, and online, that I thought he might have some ideas on how to help the Democrats, who continue to struggle with framing an election where they are holding all the cards. He did. When I suggested that he blog about his ideas, he said that since he usually expresses himself best in visual terms, he wanted to see if he could 'blog visually.'"

I think the three posters he's come up with are stunning.
10.05.2007
In Rainbows
I don't know what it is exactly, but I feel there's a common thread uniting Radiohead's recent announcement that their latest album will be available on their website for whatever you want to pay with Bill Clinton's most recent comments about philanthropy. It seems to me that they may be starting at opposite ends of the spectrum and finding themselves in a slightly similar middle ground. Both the former president and the world's greatest rock band are shedding old ways of understanding commerce and philanthropy--ways of exchanging symbols of wealth for goods and services.

Both are posing intriguing questions to the business community and society at large. What is something worth to you and what do you truly value? By offering up their music for whatever price you think is fair, Radiohead has sidestepped not only the record industry but many of the common complaints about the record industry today. They haven't replaced the traditional model with a pseudo-traditional model, ala itunes. Pay whatever you think is right.

Similarly, President Clinton, and his Clinton Global Initiative, seek to connect business, government, and non-profits in ways that break out of traditional modes. Non-profits are more able to meet their goals when they're financially sustainable. Businesses are more profitable when they're grounded in realities facing our world today--climate change, poverty, etc. Governments are most effective when they harness the capacities of the private and non-profit sectors to implement smart policy. Don't switch to clean technology merely out of the generosity of your heart--do it because it makes smart business sense. Don't invest in education in lesser developed countries because you take pity on people--do it because it strengthens the global economy, opens up new markets, enhances security, and has a positive impact on global health issues.
We have been ripe for such groundbreaking ideas as they are at once strikingly different from the common sense of the day, yet seem so obvious.

Both are posing intriguing questions to the business community and society at large. What is something worth to you and what do you truly value? By offering up their music for whatever price you think is fair, Radiohead has sidestepped not only the record industry but many of the common complaints about the record industry today. They haven't replaced the traditional model with a pseudo-traditional model, ala itunes. Pay whatever you think is right.

Similarly, President Clinton, and his Clinton Global Initiative, seek to connect business, government, and non-profits in ways that break out of traditional modes. Non-profits are more able to meet their goals when they're financially sustainable. Businesses are more profitable when they're grounded in realities facing our world today--climate change, poverty, etc. Governments are most effective when they harness the capacities of the private and non-profit sectors to implement smart policy. Don't switch to clean technology merely out of the generosity of your heart--do it because it makes smart business sense. Don't invest in education in lesser developed countries because you take pity on people--do it because it strengthens the global economy, opens up new markets, enhances security, and has a positive impact on global health issues.
We have been ripe for such groundbreaking ideas as they are at once strikingly different from the common sense of the day, yet seem so obvious.
7.28.2007
Mass Production of $100 laptop starts this week

The Economist has a great article about the One Laptop Per Child initiative.
A project that was originally discounted by the likes on Michael Dell and Intel is now receiving much praise.
The laptop sports an AMD processor under the hood. Intel originally shunned the project but now wants to be a part of it.
The bottom line: the laptop they've come up with is pretty awesome.
I want one.
If Libya can provide a laptop to every child, can't the U.S.?
Labels:
$100 laptop,
Economist,
Intel,
Michael Dell,
Nicholas Negroponte,
OLPC,
one laptop per child
4.14.2007
Targeting the Community
So I went down to the National Gallery of Modern Art to check out the Jasper Johns exhibit today.
The National Gallery of Art describes it as the following:
One of the motif's the exhibition focuses on is "the target."

Who sponsors this exhibition? Target.

The National Gallery website goes on to say:
An article statement by Target.com says:
Now, I'm no art expert, but what is fascinating to me is that Johns' work deals with seeing the same image over and over again. He made lots and lots of targets and made pieces about making targets etc. So here's Target paying for an art exhibit about the target icon. I'm not sure which philosophical term applies to that, but I'm sure something's going on there.
The National Gallery of Art describes it as the following:
Jasper Johns: An Allegory of Painting, 1955-1965 presents some of Johns' most iconic paintings, drawings, and prints selected from public and private collections, including the artist's own. Departing from the format of the survey or retrospective, the show will trace the unfolding relationship of four specific motifs in Johns' works-the target, the "device," the stenciled naming of colors, and the imprint of the body-revealing the works' significance to the following generation of artists. The exhibition includes the largest group of target paintings ever assembled. After Washington, the exhibition will travel to the Kunstmuseum Basel, June 2 through September 9, 2007, the only other venue. The exhibition is organized by the National Gallery of Art, Washington.
One of the motif's the exhibition focuses on is "the target."

Who sponsors this exhibition? Target.

The National Gallery website goes on to say:
Jasper Johns is one of the most influential figures in the history of postwar art and the National Gallery of Art's commitment to his work draws from its profound historical significance," said Earl A. Powell III, director, National Gallery of Art. "We are proud to premiere an exhibition of this scope, which provides enormous insight into Johns' philosophy of painting. We are enormously grateful to Target for this sponsorship- its fourth sponsorship at the National Gallery of Art- and Target's continuing commitment to the Gallery.
An article statement by Target.com says:
Target believes in the power of partnerships with leading cultural institutions to foster creativity, promote learning and build stronger communities. Target is therefore proud to continue its partnership with the National Gallery of Art in Washington as the sponsor of Jasper Johns: An Allegory of Painting, 1955 – 1965. Through this exhibition, guests will experience Johns’ early period of work and view some 80 exceptional works that have had an immense impact on the development of advanced art.
Now, I'm no art expert, but what is fascinating to me is that Johns' work deals with seeing the same image over and over again. He made lots and lots of targets and made pieces about making targets etc. So here's Target paying for an art exhibit about the target icon. I'm not sure which philosophical term applies to that, but I'm sure something's going on there.
4.09.2007
4.08.2007
2.21.2007
Romney Supports a State's Right to Choose
Listening to George Stephanopoulos' interview with Mitt Romney on ABC's This Week, I was struck by the Governor's explanation of his stance on abortion. While he was once pro-choice and now describes himself as pro-life, what he really likes to focus on is the states' right to determine whether they are pro-life or pro-choice. He said that under his policy, Massachusetts would remain a pro-choice state.
It seems to me that in supporting a state's right to choose, Romney has revealed his pro-choice beliefs. I'm not upset with him for this, I just wish he wouldn't try to paint his beliefs in conservative clothing.
"My view is that we should let each state have its own responsibility for guiding its laws relating to abortion.
My preference would be to see the Supreme Court do something which is up to them, not up to me. Even if elected president, I don't guide this. The Supreme Court does.
But I'd like to see the Supreme Court allow states to have greater leeway in defining their own laws."
Describing his position as an assertion of states' rights seems to be an appeal to the conservative base, but the key element of his policy can be summed up in one word: choice. Weird how someone who is trying to position themselves as pro-life is actually emphasizing their belief in choice. In fact, when I heard him describe his position I thought, if I didn't know any better I would think he's arguing for a pro-choice policy.
"I feel a great empathy for women who have difficult decisions in this regard. I don't want to impose my view on the lives of women, and yet this is one of those points where mature men and women have to come together and say, "What's the right course?" And in my particular view, I believe in life, I believe in respecting life, and I believe that we should, as a series of states, allow states to make their own choice in this regard."If it's okay to devolve the decision on abortion from the federal government to the states, why not let each county decide? And if it's okay for each county to develop their own policy, why not let each municipality decide if they are a pro-choice or pro-life community? Wait...if it's okay for each community to decide why not let each household decide?
It seems to me that in supporting a state's right to choose, Romney has revealed his pro-choice beliefs. I'm not upset with him for this, I just wish he wouldn't try to paint his beliefs in conservative clothing.
Heaven only knows
So The Economist lays out what a possible merger of the Catholic and Anglican churches would look like. It's one of those stories that you read and think--is this an April Fool's joke?
I think it goes to show how religion is understood and discussed in the British press versus the U.S. It is hard to imagine a U.S. newspaper carrying out the same line of reasoning.
I think it goes to show how religion is understood and discussed in the British press versus the U.S. It is hard to imagine a U.S. newspaper carrying out the same line of reasoning.
2.07.2007
A DRM Tipping Point?
Steve Jobs' essay "Thoughts on Music," posted on the Apple.com website yesterday has unleashed a fury of discussion on the future of digital rights management or DRM.
Steve Jobs writes, “With the stunning global success of Apple’s iPod music player and iTunes online music store, some have called for Apple to ‘open’ the digital rights management (DRM) system that Apple uses to protect its music against theft, so that music purchased from iTunes can be played on digital devices purchased from other companies, and protected music purchased from other online music stores can play on iPods. Let’s examine the current situation and how we got here, then look at three possible alternatives for the future.”
This rather low key essay resulted in a front page story on today's Financial Times, was discussed on the Economist website, and was the lead story on PRI's Marketplace morning report--among other places.
Not only is the topic of discussion important and potentially transformative, the mode with which this discussion has developed is itself intriguing. Jobs, famous for his theatrical presentations, posted his thoughts on a webpage with little fanfare. This meme was then picked up by numerous sources in the "traditional media." It will be interesting to watch this story develop and see if it has any affect on the use of DRM technology in the music industry.
Stay (i)tuned.
Steve Jobs writes, “With the stunning global success of Apple’s iPod music player and iTunes online music store, some have called for Apple to ‘open’ the digital rights management (DRM) system that Apple uses to protect its music against theft, so that music purchased from iTunes can be played on digital devices purchased from other companies, and protected music purchased from other online music stores can play on iPods. Let’s examine the current situation and how we got here, then look at three possible alternatives for the future.”
This rather low key essay resulted in a front page story on today's Financial Times, was discussed on the Economist website, and was the lead story on PRI's Marketplace morning report--among other places.
Not only is the topic of discussion important and potentially transformative, the mode with which this discussion has developed is itself intriguing. Jobs, famous for his theatrical presentations, posted his thoughts on a webpage with little fanfare. This meme was then picked up by numerous sources in the "traditional media." It will be interesting to watch this story develop and see if it has any affect on the use of DRM technology in the music industry.
Stay (i)tuned.
2.06.2007
Close but no cigar
According to the Economist, we residents of Washington, D.C. are almost full fledged participants in this experiment we like to call democracy:
"DC's congressional representative—and those of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands—inched closer to gaining full voting rights in late January. The House passed a bill allowing the five territories to vote, although if any of their votes prove decisive, the ballot will be cancelled and retaken without them. Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC's long-time congresswoman, had sponsored a bill to award these representatives full rights. So she was disappointed with the compromise, which restores the rights the representatives had before the Republican congressional takeover in 1994. She has described it as 'heartbreaking'."
Wow, thanks guys. Our elected representative is allowed to vote, but if her vote proves decisive the ballot is cancelled?! Doesn't that really defeat the voting in the first place? It reminds me of when I was a senior in high school and it came time to vote for a class song. Pink Floyd's "Another Brink in the Wall Part II" won decisively. Well this song, with it's famous line "we don't need no education," proved too much for the school administration to handle. What was their solution? The vote was retaken, but this time we were only allowed to vote for one of three pre-approved songs. Wow! How exciting! I could hardly bear the suspense! At least in this case, we were voting on a rather meaningless issue like a class song, not on huge issues like the war in Iraq and what to do about the millions of Americans who don't have health care. (In the end, John Cougar Mellancamp's "Small Town" won, and I have never quite recovered--as is obvious from this post.)
I would almost prefer the District (and other territories) weren't thrown such a pathetic bone by those members of congress (predominantly Republican) who'd prefer to get the issue off the agenda. Now they can pretend like they addressed the issue, when all they really did was come up with a politically opportunistic way to act like they did.
Let's hope our newly elected Democratic Congress will address the hypocracy of working so hard to bring democracy to far flung regions of the world while the citizens who live in our nation's capital enjoy no such right.
"DC's congressional representative—and those of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands—inched closer to gaining full voting rights in late January. The House passed a bill allowing the five territories to vote, although if any of their votes prove decisive, the ballot will be cancelled and retaken without them. Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC's long-time congresswoman, had sponsored a bill to award these representatives full rights. So she was disappointed with the compromise, which restores the rights the representatives had before the Republican congressional takeover in 1994. She has described it as 'heartbreaking'."
Wow, thanks guys. Our elected representative is allowed to vote, but if her vote proves decisive the ballot is cancelled?! Doesn't that really defeat the voting in the first place? It reminds me of when I was a senior in high school and it came time to vote for a class song. Pink Floyd's "Another Brink in the Wall Part II" won decisively. Well this song, with it's famous line "we don't need no education," proved too much for the school administration to handle. What was their solution? The vote was retaken, but this time we were only allowed to vote for one of three pre-approved songs. Wow! How exciting! I could hardly bear the suspense! At least in this case, we were voting on a rather meaningless issue like a class song, not on huge issues like the war in Iraq and what to do about the millions of Americans who don't have health care. (In the end, John Cougar Mellancamp's "Small Town" won, and I have never quite recovered--as is obvious from this post.)
I would almost prefer the District (and other territories) weren't thrown such a pathetic bone by those members of congress (predominantly Republican) who'd prefer to get the issue off the agenda. Now they can pretend like they addressed the issue, when all they really did was come up with a politically opportunistic way to act like they did.
Let's hope our newly elected Democratic Congress will address the hypocracy of working so hard to bring democracy to far flung regions of the world while the citizens who live in our nation's capital enjoy no such right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)